25 Jul What is Frill Following FOV?
Frill is a term that is used by patients who have had an FOV (Vitrectomy for Floaters) to describe a visual disturbance that occasionally occurs post-operatively in their peripheral (side) vision. This “frill” is noted by a very small subset of patients who have undergone a successful vitrectomy for floaters (FOV), that is, the floaters have been successfully removed, but a secondary problem has developed in the peripheral vision.
Unfortunately, I am unable to see “frill” through a visual examination of a patient. Nonetheless, I do sympathize with those patients who experience “frill.”
Moreover, since “frill” has not been medically defined there is no specific course of treatment.
Goal of Vitrectomy for Floaters
The goal of performing a vitrectomy for floaters is to remove and significantly reduce the number of floaters, and to do it safely. Infection, retinal tears/detachment and cataract formation are the major complications which must be considered for every patient who requires a vitrectomy, regardless of cause.
The practice of medicine is inexact and no two patients are exactly the same. Prior to obtaining a patients consent to perform a vitrectomy for the removal of floaters, I always advise that surgery may not remove all of the floaters. I do not use the term “frill” in my consent because it is not a medical term, however, I do note that residual floaters may remain.
Safety is also a goal of every surgery. I want to remove as much vitreous as possible without damaging the retina; therefore, all of the vitreous is not removed. I do this by removing the central “core” of the vitreous. The depth and the amount removed to the sides is not an exact science. I remove what I believe is a safe amount without compromising the retina. Remember, this can and will vary patient to patient.
Frill is Not a Complication of Vitrectomy
For reasons that I do not know, a small subset of patients who undergo vitrectomy report post-operatively a different type of visual disturbance than the floaters. Fortunately, while still bothersome, the disturbances are noted in their peripheral vision.
And for those few who feel they cannot function due to the peripheral abnormalities, the only recourse may be to recommend a second surgery to remove additional vitreous. With each surgery though there are risks, so the risk/benefit ratio must be fully appreciated by patients wishing to entertain a second surgery.
If I were a medical researcher with the facilities and budget to explore “frill” and its causes I certainly would; however, I am not a researcher. Instead, I use the tools and research of others to best help those in need. At this point, for patients who have had their daily activities compromised by floaters, I recommend a vitrectomy to remove the floaters.
What Does This Mean?
My goal in performing an FOV or vitrectomy for floaters, is to restore a patient’s ability to function in their daily activities without be hindered by debilitating floaters in their central vision. Over 22 years, I have performed thousands of vitrectomies and out of all of those vitrectomies only four patients have reported “frill.”
I do not say this to dismiss the very, real complaint of additional visual disturbances, rather, to show why I still believe that for the vast majority of patients I treat, vitrectomy is a highly effective procedure and that “frill” does not occur most of the time…making it even more difficult to figure out why it develops.
I understand that “frill” is discussed widely on forums and, for those patients, it is extremely frustrating to have undergone surgery, yet be left with a visual disturbance in their peripheral vision. The following possibilities are what I believe could explain post-operative “frill” and would be happy to discuss further (in later posts) with anyone who is in an ophthalmic research position that would like to explore these possible causes in greater detail.
- Unremoved Vitreous
- Shifting Vitreous
- Changing Vitreous
- Relative Loss
- Vitreous Hydration
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Ophthalmologist, Retina Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia
paul
Posted at 13:47h, 25 JulyIs there any additional risks doing a second op besides the ones present at the first surgery?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 19:25h, 27 JulyPaul,
No. Not at all. Same risks.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Buck
Posted at 22:01h, 25 JanuaryI’m an MD but no little about eyes. I’ve got a very bothersome huge central fluster. My surgeon is well trained—BP guy. He won’t do a vitrectomy until posterior vitreous detachment. He says it makes a mess of the surgical field if you have to come back increasing the risk of retinal detachment.
Is that untrue? Also, what happens to the remaining vitreous when it detaches? More issues? Im only 49 so don’t want to create trouble for myself.
I did yag laser and ended up with high iop for which I’m on drops 6 months later.
Mike Rosco
Posted at 21:39h, 12 FebruaryHi Buck!
In my experience repeated vitrectomies can be performed without sequelae from previous vitrectomies. I would favor waiting until you have a PVD as the surgery is much, much easier. If you had surgery before a PVD (happens often) the remaining vitreous may/may not cause floaters down the road. I’d consider another visit with a different specialist.
Good luck,
Dr. Mike Rosco
Teri
Posted at 12:28h, 26 JulyI am interested in learning more about frill. I have had two retinal detachments and have lost periferal vision with no explanation from my Dr. it has progressively gotten worse over time. it appears to be stable at this time. is thus related to frill?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 19:27h, 27 JulyTeri,
I think frill, for reasons I’m not sure, is reserved for patients who have had a vitrectomy for floaters who notice some new develop in their peripheral vision. I’ve never heard of this complaint from any other type of patient. Your loss is most likely from the retinal detachment.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Theresa Gachter
Posted at 12:36h, 26 JulyYesterday I read about the new surgery for Macular Degeneration performed on a man with problems and has now been able to see again with this new method inserting a telescope implanted in his eye at a cost of $15,000. Then the hospital at all other cost. Who can afford these prices?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 19:29h, 27 JulyTheresa,
The intraocular telescope may be a great development for so many who’ve lost vision due to macular degeneration. New technology is indeed expensive.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Eric
Posted at 16:52h, 26 JulyCan you explain in more detail what Frill is? You mentioned it’s a visual disturbance, but what type of disturbance?
I recently had a vitrectomy for a retinal detachment and I’m seeing visual distortion on the amsler grid in the top half of my vision. As an example, when I drive up to, and past, stoplights hanging above the street, if I keep my eyes focused on the road, the stoplights start distorting like crazy non-stop (in various directions) until I’m fully past them. So something is going on in the upper half of my eye that is causing the light rays to be bent in all the wrong directions.
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 23:03h, 26 AugustEric,
I don’t think your symptoms are related to “frill,” but rather due to the retinal detachment. I’d err on the side of assuming your symptoms are retinal detachment related whereas “frill” may be left over vitreous after vitrectomy.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Gordon McLean
Posted at 17:37h, 26 JulyFantastic information!
PLEASE doctor, where in Canada can one pay for a FOV vitrectomy?
Thanking you in advance,
Gordon McLean
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 19:34h, 27 JulyDear Gordon,
I’m sorry, but I have no idea.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Ray Norris
Posted at 18:43h, 26 JulyI got your e-mail about “Frill”. It looks like this means that it blocks your peripheral vision. What would be another word for “Frill”. I can’t understand this. Thank you.
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 19:41h, 27 JulyDear Ray,
I should have more clearly stated that frill is usually something noticed (e.g. hazyness) in the peripheral vision only following vitrectomy to remove floaters.
Did that help?
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Paul
Posted at 22:07h, 27 JulyGood to know,I want to see how things go in the next month to get a good evaluation,if my eye doesnt clear i may consider a clean up
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 21:14h, 21 AugustPaul,
We’ll get you back and make you perfect…
r
Mike
Posted at 19:01h, 28 JulyI’ve recently developed dry eye syndrome in the very eye that I’d like to have an FOV performed to remove a Weiss ring that is in the center of my vision. Will this complicate the recovery or healing process in anyway?
Thank you.
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 21:15h, 21 AugustDear Mike,
Don’t think so. Dry eye should be completely unrelated to FOV.
r
Paul
Posted at 11:59h, 16 AugustI am no expert and im not in the medical field so this is just my two cents,I was reading up on a 25 gauge curved vitrector I would immagine you could access more areas of the eye easier with a system like that,It sounded pretty interesting,Its amazing how far technology has come in the last 10 years in all fields.
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 20:59h, 26 AugustPaul,
The curved part is attractive, yet has some disadvantages to introducing them into the eye.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Paul
Posted at 09:44h, 22 AugustI just want to say you’re an amazing person and your willingness to help people is extrodinary,I hope other doctors follow in your footsteps.
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 20:58h, 26 AugustPaul,
Thanks. Hang in there. You are doing great.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Paul
Posted at 09:23h, 27 AugustI see what you’re saying,so it could work but it has its disadvantages,Its kind of a double edged sword.Maybe a vitrector that can be mechanicly bent where the doctor would have complete control of the angle,you could still enter the eye straight.with technology comes progress.
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 21:22h, 28 AugustPaul,
I understand the intrigue and do not discount the possibility of an advantage.
Randy
maher boubess
Posted at 04:44h, 26 SeptemberHELLO DR RANDALL
I HAVE BEEN ON THIS BLOG A YEAR AGO, BEFORE I HAD A VITRECTOMY ON MY RIGHT EYE PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE EXCESS SILICON OIL LEFT OVER FROM A PREVIOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT OPERATION ,BUT UNFORTUNATELY THERE WAS NO IMPROVEMENT IN THE VISION AS NOT MUCH WAS REMOVED IF ANY.
I AM WRITING TODAY TO TAKE YOUR OPINION CONCERNING MY OTHER EYE ,WHICH I HAD A CATARACT OPERATION PERFORMED THREE YEARS AGO.SINCE THEN THE VISION HS IMPROVED A LOT ,BUT ABOUT EIGHTEEN MONTHS AGO I STARTED DEVELOPING FLOATERS ,AND THE QUANTITY HAS BEEN INCREASING WITH TIME. I AM THINKING OF HAVING A FOV PERFORMED ON THIS EYE NEXT MONTH AND HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS PLEASE
1-COULD I HAVE A PVD WITHOUT FEELING IT ?
2-COULD A FOV AFFECT MY CATARACT,ALTHOUGH I HAVE HAD ALREADY A CATARACT OPERATION THREE YEARS AGO IN THIS EYE?
3-MY DR SAID THAT HE NEEDS TO PUT GAS IN MY EYE DURING THE OPERATION TO KEEP THE RETINA FROM DETACHING ,IS THAT THE NORMAL PROCEDURE DURING A FOV ,AND A NECESSARY ONE ?
YOUR FEED BACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED
THANKING YOU IN ADVANCE
MAHER BOUBESS
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 10:21h, 06 OctoberMaher,
1. PVD is painless whether is occurs naturally or if induced during surgery.
2. No. The FOV will not affect your implant at all.
3. I have no idea why using gas would be necessary. It is not what I usually do for FOV, but some surgeons feel more comfortable.
Best of luck!!
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Starchild
Posted at 06:18h, 09 NovemberHi Dr. Wong,
I also suffer from frill and am considering a follow up Vitrectomy to remove it.
My question to you is have you ever performed a FOV to remove frill specifically and was the operation successful?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 01:37h, 01 DecemberDear Starchild,
Yes. Removing more vitreous and inducing a PVD is likely to help with “frill.” Usually very effective with young floater sufferers.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
tim caton
Posted at 18:42h, 02 OctoberHi Dr Wong
I had a vitrectomy last week and think I may be one of those unlucky patients with “frill”. I see what looks like lighter-colored floaters all around my peripheral vision in my left eye. It moves with my eye and doesn’t “float” like the floaters I had removed. Does this sound like what you are referring to as frill?
If the surgeon cannot see the frill, how does he/she know what to remove?
Mike Rosco
Posted at 07:34h, 05 OctoberHello Tim,
Thank you for referencing the article Randy wrote about “frill” after a vitrectomy for floaters (FOV). As mentioned in the article, “frill” is a term used by a small subset of patients to describe a visual disturbance in their peripheral vision post-operatively. While the floaters are successfully removed, this secondary problem can develop.
To address your question about how a surgeon might approach the issue of “frill”: As stated in the article, we are unable to visually detect “frill” during an examination. The term “frill” itself hasn’t been medically defined, and there’s no specific course of treatment. The vitrectomy’s goal is to safely remove as much vitreous as possible without damaging the retina, and the amount removed can vary from patient to patient.
If you or anyone else is experiencing “frill” or any other post-operative visual disturbances, it’s essential to consult with your retina physician. While “frill” is not a common occurrence, as noted in my experience, it’s crucial to understand the potential risks and benefits if considering a second surgery (involving the removal of more vitreous)
I recognize the frustration and concern that “frill” can cause. The potential causes I’ve listed in the article, such as unremoved vitreous or shifting vitreous, are areas that could be explored further by ophthalmic researchers.
Your well-being and understanding are paramount. Again, please consult with your eye specialist for any concerns or if considering further procedures.
Wishing you clarity and peace in your recovery.
Mike Rosco, MD
Marcel Peters
Posted at 07:12h, 02 DecemberHello dr Wong,
I am 34 years old from Belgium . Two years ago I had a FOV in both eyes, PVD included with a perfect outcome. No other eye problems, glasses or what so ever.
The last two weeks I developped some problems in my left eye. I see what looks like a crack in the window of my car, but only very shortly after blinking my eyes. Whitout blinking everything looks ok, vision completely normal.
What can this be, maybe the beginning of cataract?
Regards,
Lydia
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 14:24h, 23 DecemberMarcel,
Really hard for me to judge without the advantage of performing an examination.
Obviously, get checked out!
Thanks and Happy Holidays!
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Lydia Peters
Posted at 07:17h, 02 DecemberI tried to be anonymous haha
Regards, Lydia
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 14:25h, 23 DecemberTrue anonymity is difficult….even on the web.
Thanks and Happy Holidays!
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Lydia Peters
Posted at 07:19h, 02 Decembermy original message is gone?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 14:26h, 23 DecemberNo. I must approve each message. So it sat unpublished until today, when I approved and responded. This cuts down the something called “comment spam.”
A site this size gets 100’s of attempts each day of publishing a “comment” with bogus links.
Thanks and Happy Holidays!
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
mike mariconda
Posted at 12:43h, 06 DecemberI’ve had floaters since childhood in one eye which happens to also be amblyopic. As the # of floaters grew in time I had them evaluated by both a retinal physician as well as a floater removal physician. The retinal physician observed no active disease and recommended to live with them. The laser physician could not see them and said they must be very close to the retina and since he could not see them would not be able to use a laser to destroy them. Both physicians recommended not to go the vitrectomy route due to risks. I agree that the risks are real but if they are equivalent or less than cataract surgery, that might be ok. My question is, if the floaters are very close to the retina so that they could not even been seen, then would a vitectomy get them out?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 14:32h, 23 DecemberDear Mike,
Modern vitrectomy is very safe. Less likely to get blinding infection from infection than compared to cataract surgery.
If the floaters are very close to the retina, vitrectomy is the answer. Think of the vitrector as a sort of “vacuum.”
Thanks and Happy Holidays!
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Fairfax, VA 22030
http://www.TotalRetina.com
Michael Hernandez
Posted at 01:11h, 30 Januarydo you think is better FOV Core or FOV PVD for a patient of 31 years? My doctor only gives me FOV Core. Do you think?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 07:19h, 04 FebruaryMichael,
Tough question as I can’t examine you. Based upon your age of 31, I’d think you might see better if a PVD were induced. You could do “core” and see what happens.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Northern Virginia
Fairfax, VA. 22030
http://www.vitrectomyforfloaters.com
Michael Hernandez
Posted at 19:31h, 13 FebruaryMy floaters in my left eye are not as many compared to others (although my quality of life has been significantly reduced) are lines, dots and transparent worms, I would have a core vitrectomy, but I’m afraid because patients “frill” that are reported in the various forums, my doctor says that the edges of the vitreous are outside the field of view, I would like to know what percentage of patients complain of frill? and patients who complain of frill are young or old? Thanks Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 11:53h, 16 FebruaryMichael,
Frill seems to be limited mostly to the young and in those without a PVD (i.e. most).
I would say fewer than 10% notice or complain of frill. Very, very few if a PVD is induced.
I hope this was helpful.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Northern Virginia
Fairfax, VA. 22030
http://www.vitrectomyforfloaters.com
Francois
Posted at 07:28h, 14 FebruaryDear Randy,
I am highly myopic (-15 range) French man.
Back in June 2012, only a few weeks after a retinal hemorrhage on the right eye, leaving me with a damaged VA o this eye, I suffered suddenly on floaters on my left eye, following PVD according to my retina expert.
Rather annoying to have big floaters on the ‘good’ eye!
I posted at that time on your site and your very kindly answered on the possiblity to offer FOV, even to highly mypic patients.
Thanks to yoru advice, and I must confess, to another very open and professional retina expert in France, I was offered the FOV on this left eye. Only after 6-8 months, to leave the time etc… as it is now quite well admitted.
I was operated in May 2013, and was fantastically happy about the outcome. Clear vision. Not less.
Tilll yesterday, when I noticed firstly flashes on left eye. It was not the first ones (had them few months ago, and retina check was okay and they faded over several months), but these ones, within a few hours disappeared and left me with 2 large floaters in what I thought would remain a floater free eye.
These ones seem to come less often in central vision, but they sometime do. And I feel so sad to see again what I had seend disappearing with FOV!
I know I ‘only’ got core FOV, quite standard practice. So I assume these floaters are coming from an evolution of the PVD on the remaining Vitreous?
So my questions to you are:
1) I think I saw in one of your post you would not expect new floaters to appear after FOV (I know some can REMAIN though, but that is not the case here). Can you elaborate on that? How would you explain my condition (with the limited information I give you, sorry).
2. would you expect these two floaters to ‘behave’ differently from the ones I had already who a) were moving all over the field of vision and b) tended to consolidate over time in only one massive floater. Most importantly: do these have more chance to settle down somewhere in a place I can JUST FORGET THEM!? I swear if they stay there I wont attack them! The previous floaters never did.
3. Would 2nd FOV be an option, if the floaters remain really annoying (I know this is not a comfort surgery and there are risks) and then what would it mean? Take out more vitreous? Risks of cataract then?
I take this opportunity to say that, as usual, I did retina check this morning with eye doctor who confirmed no retinal tear/detachment, as this was obviously the most important to check.
Many thanks in advance for your feedback.
And a great thank for all your time and effort. You are very precious to our community.
Kind regards from France
Francois
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 12:00h, 16 FebruaryFrancois,
1. It is possible that a lot of vitreous remained after the core vitrectomy. This would explain appearance of the floaters – if due to the vitreous and nothing else (e.g. blood, inflammation from uveitis).
2. Hard to say. Doubt they will coalesce. Greater chance of moving if some of the vitreous was removed.
3. Yes. Certainly an option and I’d consider inducing a PVD if one hasn’t developed.
Glad you had your retina checked with the emergence of new floaters….very smart!
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Northern Virginia
Fairfax, VA. 22030
http://www.vitrectomyforfloaters.com
Michael Hernandez
Posted at 02:45h, 19 FebruaryRandy thank you very much for your information.
My last questions are:
1. Some patients say this frill disappears in a time (6-18 months), is this true? or to remove the frill would necessarily need another vitrectomy?
2. what is the risk of retinal tears iatrogenic with PVD?
Thank you
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 11:21h, 04 MarchMichael,
1. I don’t think true frill disappears. I am pretty sure it’s due to an optical property of the vitreous.
2. I estimate the risk of tears with inducing a PVD to be about 2%.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Northern Virginia
Fairfax, VA. 22030
http://www.vitrectomyforfloaters.com
Mario Cataldo
Posted at 02:50h, 20 FebruaryHello Randy
My name is Mario, I am from Peru, I am 30 years old
I have carefully read your comments, they are a great information, I would like to ask some questions
1. As expected the percentage of retinal detachment, vitrectomy for PVD, someone in his 30s?
2 What is the most recurrent complication with PVD?, Regardless of future cataract
3.. If anyone 30 years, a core vitrectomy is done. Percentage you think you might have a frill?
4. What percentage of vitreous retina that a core vitrectomy or PVD?
thanks
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 11:28h, 04 MarchMario,
1. Less than 1%
2. PVD is a naturally occurring event. During the period after a PVD occurs, one needs to be aware of possible retinal tears leading to a retinal detachment.
3. Really, really tough. 30 years old is a grey zone between young and “not so young.” Regardless, frill seems to be more prevalent in younger patients. It is for this reason that I’ve lately considered inducing a PVD more often than not.
4. I don’t understand this question.
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Northern Virginia
Fairfax, VA. 22030
http://www.vitrectomyforfloaters.com
Cheryl Beatty
Posted at 11:59h, 08 MarchPositive dysphotopsia, a subsequent YAG and symptomatic PVD eventually (a year later) led to a successful IOL exchange and posterior vitrectomy on my left eye. Immediately after the surgery, I developed a small peripheral visual disturbance at the two o’clock position. It is flower shaped, scintillates in bright light and appears as a shadow in lower lighting conditions. My surgeon has concluded that it is caused by retinal scarring from a previous serous retinopathy. The scars existed before my surgery but did not affect my vision until I had the vitrectomy.
Do you think this diagnosis may solve some of the mystery of “frill”? The symptoms have not changed in three months and I have gotten used to this minor inconvenience. It is a small price to pay for a clear vitreous.
Thank you for this wonderful web site. I have found it to be very informative.
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 14:36h, 17 MarchCheryl,
Don’t know if this answers the frill issue. I’d be more inclined to think, based upon your specific history including macular scars, that your symptoms are not frill related.
Thanks for the plaudits!
Randy
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Retina Specialist
Northern Virginia
Fairfax, VA. 22030
http://www.vitrectomyforfloaters.com
Luis Miguel Vallejo
Posted at 21:09h, 02 JuneHow much it costs for one eye?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 10:51h, 12 JuneLuis,
I’ll have Chrissy email you separately.
Randy
Dillon
Posted at 16:43h, 04 JuneHello dr. Just a couple of questions if you don’t mind.
1: I have read that some Dr’s performing fov if the surgery doesn’t get rid of all the floaters the first time that they will do another surgery free of charge to make sure that the customer is completely satisfied. Is this something you do or would do?
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 23:26h, 09 JuneDillon,
It would be foolish for me to guarantee anything with a medical procedure and, hence, I do not. Some obviously feel otherwise.
Thanks,
r
Dillon
Posted at 15:25h, 13 JuneThanks for the response Dr. Do most of your patients say the surgery gets rid of all there floaters 100%? Or do they still see some floaters but better then they were? Any percentages? Thanks again
Randall V. Wong, M.D.
Posted at 14:19h, 12 JulyDillon,
“Most” say all are gone. I’d count on a huge reduction with the possibility of “all.”
Randy
Robert
Posted at 19:59h, 30 SeptemberDr., I’m a 62-year old who’s had cataract surgeries in both eyes with subsequent PVDs. When I asked my surgeon last year about getting an FOV, she responded, “Absolutely not. It’s dangerous and irresponsible.” This year, she said she and the rest of her clinic had a chance of heart and that an FOV was an excellent idea! She suggested we schedule surgery but I have a few reservations:
1. Should I schedule FOV surgery with a surgeon who strongly disapproved of them less than a year ago?
2. What qualifications should I look for in a surgeon to perform an FOV?
Honestly, I’ve used more due diligence in selecting a good car mechanic! Now that I’ve decided to go forward with an FOV, what criteria should I look for in selecting a surgeon? I only get one try with this!
Mike Rosco
Posted at 08:11h, 05 OctoberHi Robert!
Your concerns about an FOV procedure are valid. Here’s a brief overview to address your reservations:
Change in Surgeon’s Opinion: Medical stances can evolve with new research, improved techniques, or added experience. Discuss with your surgeon about the reasons for her changed perspective.
**Qualifications for an FOV Surgeon:**
Experience: A surgeon’s number of completed FOV procedures is an important consideration.
Specialization: Competent vitreoretinal surgeons are an essential. You can even search your physician’s name on Google to review her education/qualifications/distinctions/so on.
Patient Reviews: Look for testimonials, especially from those who’ve had a Floater-only-Vitrectomy. However, keep in mind that reviews can sometimes be skewed; patients with positive surgical outcomes might not always leave reviews, while those who had disappointing results are more inclined to voice their concerns (This is a real, documented psychological phenomeon). Hence, it’s wise to weigh patient reviews alongside other factors.
Communication & Post-Op Availability: Ensure the surgeon provides clear, understandable pre-and-postoperative information (risks/benefits/alternatives). Confirm that they will be easily reachable after the procedure is done.
Your due diligence in choosing a surgeon (loved the car mechanic analogy!) is commendable. Remember – You can always consider a second opinion if you’re still uncertain.
Best wishes in your decisionmaking process, Robert!
Mike Rosco, MD